February 25, 2019
Share sales and assets sales the pros and cons
How the sale of a business is structured will depend on the circumstances and aims of the buyer and the seller. As a general proposition an individual seller will normally wish to sell the company carrying on a business although a buyer may wish to buy the business and assets.
Share sale
The tax advantages of a share sale to the seller are substantial.
First, there is only one tier of taxation. The proceeds of sale are received directly by the individual; in an asset sale the company may be taxable on the sale of the business and the shareholder taxed again when the proceeds of sale are taken out of the company.
Second, the proceeds of a share sale are subject to capital gains tax (unless exceptionally the proceeds of sale are taxable as income under anti-avoidance provisions such as the employment related securities regime). As a result the maximum rate of capital gains tax payable by the seller will be 20% although it may be 10% if
(a) the seller qualifies for entrepreneurs’’ relief (which is available to directors or employees owning more than 5% of a qualifying trading company)
(b) EMI entrepreneurs’ relief which is available to employees acquiring their shares on the exercise of EMI options no matter how small the shareholding and
(c) investors relief which is available to shareholders other than employees who have held their shares for at least 3 years. In short the 10% rate of capital gains tax may be available to a wide range of shareholders.
This should be compared with the taxation of a sale of the company’s business and assets. The company will incur a liability to corporation tax on the asset sale at a rate of 19% of the profits however there will be a further tax charge on the distribution of those profits to the shareholders. Further the individuals will be liable to taxation at potentially 38.1%. A shareholder could take the proceeds of an asset sale out of a company by putting the company into liquidation in which case they may be taxable as capital at 20% or even 10% if entrepreneurs relief were available. However, the capital treatment of a distribution in a winding up is subject to anti-avoidance rules one of which may tax a distribution as income if the shareholder carries on a similar business to that carried on by the company in liquidation within in 2 year period.
So pausing here a seller may be able to mitigate the amount of tax payable on an asset sale however it will normally be more and potentially considerably more than the tax which would have been paid on a share sale. So why would anyone arrange for a sale of the company’s business rather than its shares?
Asset sale
There are a number of reasons for an asset sale. From a buyer’s point of view there is little reason to recommend a share purchase. The only tax relief that may be available for the cost of acquisition of the shares is an increase in the base cost of those shares. However, the gain on the sale of the shares may fall outside the scope of taxation if substantial shareholding exemption is available to the buyer in which case there is no tax benefit from incurring expenditure on the purchase of the shares. Even if the buyer were to pay capital gains tax on a subsequent sale of the shares the current value of that future tax relief (taking into account the timing and probability of that future sale) is likely to be low.
A buyer may, however, be entitled to tax relief for expenditure incurred on a number of business assets including plant and machinery and intangible assets (other than goodwill) the buyer may be able to roll gains arising on the disposal of assets by it into business assets it acquires.
In addition, there are no stamp taxes paid on the acquisition of assets other than land (although as businesses do not normally own their own premises stamp duty land tax is not normally an issue) whereas stamp duty is payable at 0.5% of the consideration given for shares in a UK company.
Historic liabilities
Another feature of an asset sale is that the buyer does not generally take over the historic tax liabilities of the business being acquired.
(Assuming the business acquisition is a transfer of a going concern for Vat purposes the buyer will not pay Vat on the acquisition but may inherit the sellers position under the capital goods scheme however the capital goods scheme provisions apply to a limited range of assets and are not normally a problem in practice). The buyer in acquiring the target company will take over all the target company’s liabilities including tax. A buyer will require a full range of warranties and indemnities on a share purchase and this may increase the duration and costs of the transaction.
This of itself may not be sufficient to result in the transaction being structured as an asset rather than a share sale. In my experience given the tax benefits to the seller of a share sale the seller may go to the expense of a complex pre-sale reorganisation to seek to achieve the share sale of a company owning the business whilst retaining a company with the historic business liabilities.
Perhaps the most likely reason that a seller would accept an asset sale is one of practical necessity. If the seller wished to retain part of the business an asset sale may be the only practical method of achieving this. However, even here there is room for some tax planning.
A seller could arrange for the company to transfer the part of the business to be sold to a subsidiary. If the subsidiary carries on the part of the business as a separate trade. As such the company may be able to sell the subsidiary and avoid any tax on sale of the subsidiary and de-grouping charge if it qualifies for substantial shareholding exemption.
Whilst a buyer will normally prefer an asset sale the financial attraction of a share sale for the seller is very strong and it will normally be sensible to seek to restructure the target company or its business before the sale to enable a corporate sale in a way which is acceptable to the buyer.
This document is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. It is recommended that specific professional advice is sought before acting on any of the information given.
Author: Huw Witty, Partner and Head of Tax